site feasibility / clinical ops / venture prototype
Leadership-style internal SaaS demo for country/site prioritization, scenario simulation, and explainable recommendations.
Scenario simulation for country and site strategy
This is where the site strategy becomes a leadership decision: speed, enrollment, representation, or a balanced launch.
Scenario compare matrix
Each scenario changes the scoring logic and shifts who becomes Tier 1.
Balanced launch
Balances startup friction and patient flow; leadership-friendly default shortlist.
Startup weight
26%
Enrollment weight
34%
Diversity weight
18%
Speed-first
Prioritizes activation speed to de-risk FPI and early operational optics.
Startup weight
42%
Enrollment weight
28%
Diversity weight
10%
Enrollment-first
Biases toward sites with stronger ILD pool even if startup support must increase.
Startup weight
18%
Enrollment weight
46%
Diversity weight
14%
Representation-led
Optimizes diversity fit while preserving enough activation velocity for leadership confidence.
Startup weight
18%
Enrollment weight
28%
Diversity weight
34%
Leadership takeaway
The shortlist is not just the highest-scoring sites. It is the smallest cross-country mix that can absorb protocol complexity, hit activation optics, and still protect enrollment.