StochStack

site feasibility / clinical ops / venture prototype

Leadership-style internal SaaS demo for country/site prioritization, scenario simulation, and explainable recommendations.

Mock StudyNo backend
Startup pressure

Germany and UK drive scientific fit, but startup drag remains the main operational threat.

Enrollment logic

Enrollment is concentrated in 6-7 sites; reserve sites help optics but not target delivery.

Competition watch

London and Berlin improve fit but need competitive contingency planning before activation.

Recommendation logic

Spain + Italy form the most presentation-ready launch layer; Germany/UK add depth selectively.

Protocol complexity is the hidden feasibility driver.

Sites with high patient access still fall out if imaging cadence, screen-fail logic, and coordinator burden are not explicitly modeled in the score.

Dashboard

Executive Site Feasibility Dashboard

Single-screen view of protocol burden, country readiness, startup risk, and shortlist strength for RESP-204.

Protocol complexity

78/100

High due to image cadence, respiratory function checks, and layered inclusion criteria.

Target enrollment

180

Planned across 6 countries with 9 initial activations.

Tier 1 sites

0

Sites already strong enough for immediate outreach.

Forecast LPI

39 weeks

Balanced launch scenario using current mock assumptions.

Country readiness and startup pressure

Enrollment forecast, startup risk, and readiness stacked into one comparative view.

Tier 1 recommendation stack

Best current shortlist for leadership review.

1. Madrid Respiratory Research Unit

Spain / Madrid · Urban referral + community mix

71.2

Monitor as reserve or scenario-dependent inclusion.

2. Seville Pulmonary Access Site

Spain / Seville · Broader respiratory access network

69.4

Monitor as reserve or scenario-dependent inclusion.

3. Milan PulmoScience Center

Italy / Milan · Advanced ILD + imaging infrastructure

68.7

Monitor as reserve or scenario-dependent inclusion.

Enrollment plan vs forecast

Used to communicate whether current site mix can absorb protocol complexity without missing the Phase II operating window.

Leadership takeaway

The shortlist is not just the highest-scoring sites. It is the smallest cross-country mix that can absorb protocol complexity, hit activation optics, and still protect enrollment.